Which historical example highlights Hezbollah's strategy of mixing conventional capabilities with irregular tactics?

Hezbollah's strategy of combining conventional military capabilities with irregular tactics is vividly illustrated during the 2006 conflict with Israel. This engagement showcased the group’s ability to utilize guerrilla warfare techniques while also employing more conventional military assets. Hezbollah operated using a mix of asymmetric tactics, such as ambushes and rocket attacks, alongside more organized military actions, demonstrating their capacity to adapt to the battlefield dynamics.

During the conflict, Hezbollah engaged in direct confrontations with Israeli forces, utilizing anti-tank munitions and sophisticated communication systems. Additionally, they leveraged their understanding of the terrain and urban environments, which are characteristic of irregular warfare, to defend their positions and inflict substantial casualties on Israeli forces.

This successful blending of tactics allowed Hezbollah to sustain their operations despite facing a more conventionally powerful military force, underscoring the effectiveness of their strategy. The 2006 war is, therefore, emblematic of how Hezbollah has innovatively combined traditional military approaches with irregular tactics to achieve its objectives.